|
|
Post by Alydos on Apr 15, 2006 5:49:16 GMT -5
*waits til no one is looking, looks both ways* Genius! Kweee! *hugs Momo*
I knew that there was someone who might have a chance of proving our Way and that we are never cruel to animals, except humans, who we are just helping to speed up the natural order!
|
|
|
|
Post by Wolfy on Apr 15, 2006 10:09:23 GMT -5
NEVER!!!!!!
However, if you can prove that no animals,at all, will be used in the pitfights, *shrugs*then i have no problem with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alydos on Apr 15, 2006 17:51:39 GMT -5
What would be the problem with the natural order of hunting? The humans would be unarmed and would have to fight very hard to even hurt the animals.
If somebody (that includes the animals) becomes hurt in the exchange of Survival of the Fittest, then the animal (that includes humans) would die with it`s integrity. They fought for their food and weren`t strong enough.
If it is your interest to warp the natural order to where there is no balance, then hence with thy self, Wolf!
|
|
|
|
Post by Wolfy on Apr 15, 2006 18:15:02 GMT -5
In the natural order, an animal would never fight a human unless A: It was protecting it's children, B: It was cornered, or C: It was sick. So, unless you are releasing rabid animals in your pitfight, you would be the one corupting the natural order. Or would you stoop so low as to put babies in danger? And capturing an animal just to corner it in a pitfight would not be fitting in with your "natural order" standpoint, either, since no healthy wild animal would go near that many humans willingly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daggertooth on Apr 15, 2006 19:23:38 GMT -5
Donft misunderstand survival of the fittest. It is much more complex than simple strength. Fitness has a whole other meaning biology, it notates survivorship as well as ability to reproduce. A smaller organism able to live longer and yield more offspring would be much more fit than any number of larger stronger individuals. To reduce the natural order to brute strength is both incorrect and demeaning.  Yes Momo, you have historical president. But I have a lot of cool sci-fi movies. Umcignore resident evil. I am soooo much better with my biology and isolated populations. I still think your culling the weak based on financial and social economic standing than you are intelligence. And animal cruelty is not an option. However, there may be an outlet for a partnership of sorts, this may be an opportunity to test out the intelligence, tactics, strength, and overall ability of my GE humans. No fighting to the death though. I suppose I could partner with you and still maintain my goal of owning most of humanity and a large chunk of the world in my own private company. Of course it is the earth I am thinking about. Daggertooth |
|
|
|
Post by Wolfy on Apr 15, 2006 19:27:25 GMT -5
Umm...Boss... .... ... you know what? As long as there are no animals involved, it doesn't muh matter to me...And none of my friends and family, that goes without saying. Or at least it should...^_^
|
|
|
|
Post by Daggertooth on Apr 15, 2006 19:34:03 GMT -5
Oh of course, the GE humans are volunteers. They sign a contract and everything. Therefs a lot of different reasons for this. Some want the cash rewards so they can move up in life without doing anything. Some are curious about what can be done. The military works at perfection. Some people havecumcfetishescfor things. Itfs a business in and of itself.
Daggertooth
|
|
|
|
Post by Wolfy on Apr 17, 2006 13:38:42 GMT -5
Finally...I got my lbuisiness card uploaded...  Yes...not much, but i like it...it's even better animated...^_^ |
|
|
|
Post by Daggertooth on Apr 17, 2006 19:11:02 GMT -5
Cool Beans. So, what education and experience do you have so far in the treatment of animals. (humans count. ) Any symbology going on here? Deep meaning stuff like a blue pentagram under a black pentagram means...something? |
|
|
|
Post by Wolfy on Apr 17, 2006 19:19:41 GMT -5
actually, the colors mean it more than the shapes. I just thought the pentagrams looked cool. I don't really remember what all the colors mean, but blue is like healing and soothing, and the silver is science....i think...
As for experience, none, really. Eucation, well...not much... still in high school, after all...^^;;
|
|
|
|
Post by Alydos on Apr 17, 2006 23:05:26 GMT -5
I like the business card, it has good taste, which, coming from me means it is terrible to anyone else!!!
Well, on to my next big idea. Using the slave labor of Oompa Loompa's, we could create our own factory that sells weapons in the guise of chocolate, but I need some new ideas for expansion, any takers?
|
|
|
|
Post by Wolfy on May 7, 2006 18:16:08 GMT -5
Oompa Loompas, huh? *thinks*...yeah, that could work... *goes off to plot*
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth Asathi on May 7, 2006 20:48:16 GMT -5
I am all for culling the population. I am certain there are simply too many humans, and that something needs to be done about it. Hopefully the next pandemic will serve to do something about it. I think we need to remove some 40% of our population
Rather than outsource jobs to foreign countries... we outsource people. We outsource lazy people to do the difficult and tedius jobs in foreign countries. Maybe we could empty out some prisons like this, make the prisoners work in sweatshops in Taiwan, while we sit back and reap the reward of comfortable footwear!
And for the minor offenders, we equip them with shock collars and make them work in fast food for a set period of time, without pay! Maybe that'll teach them a little respect for the law and their fellow human!
Meanwhile we have less people leeching off the system, have deleted prison maintainance costs from the budget, reduced all kinds of crime by a humane but firm legal system, deporting people for a set amount of time based on the crime they commit. Increased our imports without increasing the cost... and maybe, just maybe we can balance the budget!
I'd like to note that my idea to cull the population isn't based on one's intelligence, but based solely on their usefulness to the economy... let's face it, if we only kept the intelligent people, there wouldn't be a viable gene pool. (*Tease Tease*)
|
|
